Back to Search Start Over

Infection control dogma: top 10 suspects.

Authors :
Manangan LP
Pugliese G
Jackson M
Lynch P
Sohn AH
Sinkowitz-Cochran RL
Jarvis WR
Source :
Infection control and hospital epidemiology [Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol] 2001 Apr; Vol. 22 (4), pp. 243-7.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

As infection control evolved into an art and science through the years, many infection control practices have become infection control dogmas (principles, beliefs, ideas, or opinions). In this "Reality Check" session of the 4th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections, we assessed participants' perceptions of prevalent infection control dogmas. The majority of participants agreed with all dogmas having evidence of efficacy, except for the dogma on the frequency of changing mechanical-ventilator tubing. In contrast, the majority of participants disagreed with dogmas not having evidence of efficacy, except for the dogma on perineal care, umbilical cord care, and reminder signs for isolation precaution. As for controversial dogmas, many of the responses were almost evenly distributed between "agree" and "disagree." Infection control professionals were knowledgeable about evidence-based infection control practices. However, many of the respondents still believe in some of the non-evidence-based dogmas.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0899-823X
Volume :
22
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Infection control and hospital epidemiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11379715
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1086/501894