Back to Search Start Over

Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.

Authors :
Brainerd CJ
Wright R
Reyna VF
Mojardin AH
Source :
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition [J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn] 2001 Mar; Vol. 27 (2), pp. 307-27.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

A new methodology for measuring illusory conscious experience of the "presentation" of unstudied material (phantom recollection) is evaluated that extracts measurements directly from recognition responses, rather than indirectly from introspective reports. Application of this methodology in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (Experiments 1 and 2) and in a more conventional paradigm (Experiment 3) showed that 2 processes (phantom recollection and familiarity) contribute to false recognition of semantically related distractors. Phantom recollection was the larger contributor to false recognition of critical distractors in the DRM paradigm, but surprisingly, it was also the larger contributor to false recognition of other types of distractors. Variability in false recognition was tied to variability in phantom recollection. Experimental control of phantom recollection was achieved with manipulations that were motivated by fuzzy-trace theory's hypothesis that the phenomenon is gist-based.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0278-7393
Volume :
27
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11294434
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.307