Back to Search Start Over

Sex differences in the prognosis of congestive heart failure: results from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II).

Authors :
Simon T
Mary-Krause M
Funck-Brentano C
Jaillon P
Source :
Circulation [Circulation] 2001 Jan 23; Vol. 103 (3), pp. 375-80.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

Background: Whether female sex is associated with a better prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) remains uncertain. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) II showed that bisoprolol reduced all-cause mortality and morbidity rates in CHF patients treated with diuretics and ACE inhibitors. We examined whether survival was different in men (n=2132) and women (n=515) enrolled in CIBIS II.<br />Methods and Results: Women differed from men with regard to age, NYHA functional classification, primary cause of CHF, and risk factors such as left bundle-branch block. After adjustment for baseline differences, the probability of all-cause mortality was significantly reduced by 36% in women compared with that in men (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.86, P:=0.003). Women also had a 39% reduction in cardiovascular deaths (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.91, P:=0.01) and a 70% reduction in deaths from pump failure (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.70, P:=0.005) compared with men. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality among women treated with bisoprolol compared with men (6% versus 12% P:=0.01) but not among women treated with placebo (13% versus 18%, P:=0.10). However, this sex/ss-blocker effect was not significant in multivariate analysis.<br />Conclusions: These results indicate that regardless of ss-blocker treatment and baseline clinical profile, female sex is a significant independent predictor of survival in patients with CHF.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4539
Volume :
103
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11157688
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.3.375