Back to Search Start Over

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing standard clinical doses of omeprazole and lansoprazole in erosive oesophagitis.

Authors :
Sharma VK
Leontiadis GI
Howden CW
Source :
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics [Aliment Pharmacol Ther] 2001 Feb; Vol. 15 (2), pp. 227-31.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

Background: Omeprazole and lansoprazole are used to treat erosive oesophagitis in the respective daily doses of 20 and 30 mg.<br />Aim: To investigate, by meta-analysis, whether treatment with lansoprazole 30 mg increases erosive oesophagitis healing rates over omeprazole 20 mg.<br />Methods: We searched for randomized, double-blind trials comparing omeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg in endoscopically diagnosed erosive oesophagitis. After assessing for homogeneity, non-heterogeneous trials were combined and pooled healing rates derived. We calculated the relative benefit increase, absolute benefit increase and number needed to treat.<br />Results: Six trials without significant heterogeneity met predetermined inclusion criteria. By per protocol analysis, pooled healing rates for omeprazole 20 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg were, respectively, 74.7% and 77.7% after 4 weeks and 87.0% and 88.7% after 8 weeks. The corresponding figures by intention-to-treat analysis were 70.8% and 72.7% after 4 weeks and 81.8% and 83.3% after 8 weeks. In each analysis the absolute benefit increase for lansoprazole was small and its 95% confidence interval encompassed zero.<br />Conclusion: Lansoprazole 30 mg produces healing rates in erosive oesophagitis that are not statistically significantly different to those of omeprazole 20 mg.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0269-2813
Volume :
15
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
11148442
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00904.x