Back to Search Start Over

Quality assurance and risk reduction guidelines.

Authors :
Mody DR
Davey DD
Branca M
Raab SS
Schenck UG
Stanley MW
Wright RG
Arbyn M
Beccati D
Bishop JW
Collaço LM
Cramer SF
Fitzgerald P
Heinrich J
Jhala NC
Montanari G
Kapila K
Naryshkin S
Suprun HZ
Source :
Acta cytologica [Acta Cytol] 2000 Jul-Aug; Vol. 44 (4), pp. 496-507.
Publication Year :
2000

Abstract

Cervical cancer continues to be a major cause of death in women worldwide. The major problem facing most women is the unavailability of screening Pap tests in poor and underdeveloped countries. While rates of cancer deaths have decreased 60-80% in developed countries since the Pap test became available, the accuracy of Paps was challenged recently. In order to instill public confidence and promote optimal patient care, measures to improve the quality of the entire screening process should be undertaken. Continuous quality improvement processes are more appropriate than traditional quality assurance monitors. Although no standards can be defined that are applicable to all laboratory settings and nations, this document provides current views on universal quality procedures and risk reduction. Procedure/policy manuals, workload assessment, hierarchic/peer review, discrepancy analysis, rescreening studies and cytohistologic correlation are examples of universally applicable quality tools. The variability in practices in different parts of the world is also discussed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0001-5547
Volume :
44
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Acta cytologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
10934940
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000328521