Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of an acute pain service inception in a general hospital.

Authors :
Bardiau FM
Braeckman MM
Seidel L
Albert A
Boogaerts JG
Source :
Journal of clinical anesthesia [J Clin Anesth] 1999 Nov; Vol. 11 (7), pp. 583-9.
Publication Year :
1999

Abstract

Study Objectives: To assess the effects of an Acute Pain Service (APS) inception on postoperative pain management in a general teaching hospital using pain indicators as performance measures.<br />Design: Open, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study.<br />Setting: Postanesthesia Care Unit, surgical wards of University Hospital Center of Charleroi.<br />Patients: 1304 patients in the pre-APS inception phase and 671 patients after its implemention who have undergone various types of surgery (orthopedics, gynecology, urology, neurosurgery, stomatology, ear, nose, and throat, ophthalmic, abdominal, vascular-thoracic, plastic, and maxillofacial).<br />Interventions: An APS, nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised model was devised, based on the concept that postoperative pain relief can be greatly improved by providing in-service training for surgical nursing staff and optimal use of systemic analgesics.<br />Measurements and Main Results: Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) every 4 hours for 72 hours in the two phases. Analgesic consumption was registered at the same time. Time-related VAS scores were summarized using several pain indicators. There was an overall improvement in the pain scores after APS inception. The differences were most pronounced, around 50%, in patients undergoing vascular, maxillofacial, gynecologic, and urologic surgeries, and stomatology. Regular administration of paracetamol and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs decreased morphine consumption in the second phase.<br />Conclusion: This study validates the benefits of a formal APS, using continuous monitoring of rest pain intensity and analgesic consumption in the postoperative period. Results not only support previous research findings but also offer outcome-based tools to evaluate current practices as compared with desired outcomes.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0952-8180
Volume :
11
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical anesthesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
10624644
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00101-4