Back to Search
Start Over
Therapeutic equivalence: all studies are not created equal.
- Source :
-
The Canadian journal of clinical pharmacology = Journal canadien de pharmacologie clinique [Can J Clin Pharmacol] 1999 Spring; Vol. 6 (1), pp. 9-11. - Publication Year :
- 1999
-
Abstract
- With an increasing number of available treatment options, clinicians must frequently evaluate whether comparable therapies are equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety. Two methodologically distinct study designs are used to establish therapeutic equivalence: standard superiority trials and true equivalence trials. In either study design, clinician-readers assess equivalence by examining both the statistical significance and the clinical importance of the study results (as defined by the minimally important difference, the smallest difference in patient outcome that would lead to an important difference in patient health status). Once therapeutic equivalence has been established, clinicians may select one therapy as the preferred treatment option because it offers other clinical benefits, such as a lower cost or a more convenient drug administration schedule.
- Subjects :
- Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Research Design
Therapeutic Equivalency
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1198-581X
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Canadian journal of clinical pharmacology = Journal canadien de pharmacologie clinique
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 10465859