Immediate application of positive-end expiratory pressure is more effective than delayed positive-end expiratory pressure to reduce extravascular lung water.

MLA

Ruiz-Bailén, M., et al. “Immediate Application of Positive-End Expiratory Pressure Is More Effective than Delayed Positive-End Expiratory Pressure to Reduce Extravascular Lung Water.” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 27, no. 2, Feb. 1999, pp. 380–84. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199902000-00046.

APA

Ruiz-Bailén, M., Fernández-Mondéjar, E., Hurtado-Ruiz, B., Colmenero-Ruiz, M., Rivera-Fernández, R., Guerrero-López, F., & Vázquez-Mata, G. (1999). Immediate application of positive-end expiratory pressure is more effective than delayed positive-end expiratory pressure to reduce extravascular lung water. Critical Care Medicine, 27(2), 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199902000-00046

Chicago

Ruiz-Bailén, M, E Fernández-Mondéjar, B Hurtado-Ruiz, M Colmenero-Ruiz, R Rivera-Fernández, F Guerrero-López, and G Vázquez-Mata. 1999. “Immediate Application of Positive-End Expiratory Pressure Is More Effective than Delayed Positive-End Expiratory Pressure to Reduce Extravascular Lung Water.” Critical Care Medicine 27 (2): 380–84. doi:10.1097/00003246-199902000-00046.