A model analysis of costs of blood pressure destabilization and edema associated with rofecoxib and celecoxib among older patients with osteoarthritis and hypertension in a medicare choice population

Economic analyses consider all costs relevant to the use of a particular treatment or treatments. Recently, head-to-head, randomized, controlled trials have shown a significantly higher incidence of blood pressure (BP) destabilization and clinically significant edema with rofecoxib than with celecoxib among older, hypertensive patients with osteoarthritis (OA).The objective of this analysis was to estimate the COX-2 specific inhibitor medication costs, in addition to the costs of drugs and physicians'' fees, for BP destabilization and clinically significant edema associated with the use of rofecoxib 25 mg QD and celecoxib 200 mg QD in patients with OA and hypertension in a Medicare Choice population (aged ≥ 65 years).A decision analysis model was constructed to determine the costs (from the payer''s perspective) of treating patients in this population with either of the 2 regimens for 6 weeks. The analysis used pooled data from 2 recent, independently conducted, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials of OA patients aged ≥ 65 years with treated hypertension who received either celecoxib 200 mg QD or rofecoxib 25 mg QD for 6 weeks. In the individual trials, rofecoxib was associated with significantly higher rates of destabilized BP (<F>P < 0.032 and P < 0.001</F>) and edema (<F>P < 0.01 and P = 0.045</F>) than celecoxib.For a 100,000-member Medicare Choice population, an estimated 25,630 persons would have OA and hypertension (stages I–III), and an estimated 5126 of these patients would use celecoxib or rofecoxib. The estimated costs were $33,938 (6.2%) higher if all hypertensive patients with OA were treated with rofecoxib rather than celecoxib for 6 weeks. The cost per day of use was $0.16 less with celecoxib, and per-patient, per-month costs were $4.79 lower. Celecoxib was a less costly treatment option than rofecoxib among OA patients with hypertension aged ≥ 65 years, based on our model of the direct costs of COX-2 specific inhibitor therapy combined with those associated with physician monitoring and treatment of edema and BP destabilization. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]