Back to Search Start Over

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: testing gravity with redshift space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles.

Authors :
Beutler, Florian
Saito, Shun
Seo, Hee-Jong
Brinkmann, Jon
Dawson, Kyle S.
Eisenstein, Daniel J.
Font-Ribera, Andreu
Ho, Shirley
McBride, Cameron K.
Montesano, Francesco
Percival, Will J.
Ross, Ashley J.
Ross, Nicholas P.
Samushia, Lado
Schlegel, David J.
Sánchez, Ariel G.
Tinker, Jeremy L.
Weaver, Benjamin A.
Source :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Sep2014, Vol. 443 Issue 2, p1065-1089. 25p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

We analyse the anisotropic clustering of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS Data Release 11 (DR11) sample, which consists of 690 827 galaxies in the redshift range 0.43 < z < 0.7 and has a sky coverage of 8498 deg2. We perform our analysis in Fourier space using a power spectrum estimator suggested by Yamamoto et al. We measure the multipole power spectra in a self-consistent manner for the first time in the sense that we provide a proper way to treat the survey window function and the integral constraint, without the commonly used assumption of an isotropic power spectrum and without the need to split the survey into subregions. The main cosmological signals exploited in our analysis are the baryon acoustic oscillations and the signal of redshift space distortions, both of which are distorted by the Alcock–Paczynski effect. Together, these signals allow us to constrain the distance ratio DV(zeff)/rs(zd) = 13.89 ± 0.18, the Alcock–Paczynski parameter FAP(zeff) = 0.679 ± 0.031 and the growth rate of structure f (zeff)σ8(zeff) = 0.419 ± 0.044 at the effective redshift zeff = 0.57. We emphasize that our constraints are robust against possible systematic uncertainties. In order to ensure this, we perform a detailed systematics study against CMASS mock galaxy catalogues and N-body simulations. We find that such systematics will lead to 3.1 per cent uncertainty for fσ8 if we limit our fitting range to k = 0.01–0.20 h Mpc−1, where the statistical uncertainty is expected to be three times larger. We did not find significant systematic uncertainties for DV/rs or FAP. Combining our data set with Planck to test General Relativity (GR) through the simple γ-parametrization, where the growth rate is given by $f(z) = \Omega ^{\gamma }_{\rm m}(z)$, reveals a ∼2σ tension between the data and the prediction by GR. The tension between our result and GR can be traced back to a tension in the clustering amplitude σ8 between CMASS and Planck. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00358711
Volume :
443
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
97547172
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1051