No influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.

Background: Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. Following oral administration, ximelagatran undergoes rapid bioconversion to its active form, melagatran, via two minor intermediates. Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m[sup 2], is a recognised risk factor for thrombosis. There is potential for differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs administered to obese versus non-obese patients, and some drugs may require alternative administration strategies in obese patients. Objective: To investigate the effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran. Design and participants: This was an open-label, single-dose, group-matched study in which obese subjects (BMI 32–39 kg/m[sup 2]; six male and six female; age 21–40 years) were matched by sex and age (±2 years) with non-obese subjects (BMI 21–26 kg/m[sup 2]; six male and six female; aged 21–39 years). Each subject received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of melagatran and activated partial thromboplastin times (APTT; a marker of melagatran pharmacodynamics) were collected up to 12 hours after administration. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of melagatran between obese and non-obese subjects. Values of area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (C[sub max]), time at which C[sub max] occurred and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 1 μmol · h/L, 0.2 μmol/L, 2 hours and 3 hours in both obese and non-obese subjects, respectively. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the obese and non-obese subjects in the amount of ximelagatran, melagatran or the minor intermediates ethyl-melagatran and melagatran hydroxyamidine excreted in urine. When relating the prolongation of APTT ratio to the square root of plasma concentration of melagatran and obesity status (no/yes), no statistically significant interaction between plasma concentration and obesity status was observed. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both obese and non-obese subjects, and no bleeding events or serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: No differences in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of melagatran were detected between obese and non-obese subjects after oral administration of ximelagatran, suggesting that dose adjustment of ximelagatran in obesity (BMI up to 39 kg/m[sup 2]) is not necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]