What's normal? Influencing women's perceptions of normal genitalia: an experiment involving exposure to modified and nonmodified images.

Objective Examine women's perceptions of what is 'normal' and 'desirable' in female genital appearance. Design Experiment with random allocation across three conditions. Setting Community. Sample A total of 97 women aged 18-30 years. Methods Women were randomly assigned to view a series of images of (1) surgically modified vulvas or (2) nonmodified vulvas, or (3) no images. They then viewed and rated ten target images of surgically modified vulvas and ten of unmodified vulvas. Main outcome measures Women used a four-point Likert scale ('strongly agree' to 'strongly disagree'), to rate each target image for 'looks normal' and 'represents society's ideal'. For each woman, we created two summary scores that represented the extent to which she rated the unmodified vulvas as more 'normal' and more 'society's ideal' than the modified vulvas. Results For ratings of 'normality,' there was a significant effect for condition ( F2,94 = 2.75 P = 0.007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]