Back to Search Start Over

Impact of High-Dose Atorvastatin Therapy and Clinical Risk Factors on Incident Aortic Valve Stenosis in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease (from TNT, IDEAL, and SPARCL).

Authors :
Arsenault, Benoit J.
Boekholdt, S. Matthijs
Mora, Samia
DeMicco, David A.
Bao, Weihang
Tardif, Jean-Claude
Amarenco, Pierre
Pedersen, Terje
Barter, Philip
Waters, David D.
Source :
American Journal of Cardiology. 2014, Vol. 113 Issue 8, p1378-1382. 5p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Clinical trials have not provided evidence for a role of statin therapy in reducing aortic valve stenosis (AVS) severity in patients with documented AVS. However, whether statin therapy could prevent the onset of AVS is unknown. Our objectives were (1) to compare the incidence rates of AVS among patients treated with high-dose versus usual-dose statin or placebo and (2) to identify clinical risk factors associated with the development of AVS. We conducted post hoc analyses in 23,508 participants from 3 large-scale multicenter atorvastatin randomized blinded clinical trials: Treating to New Targets, the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering, and the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels. The main outcome measure was the incidence of clinical AVS over a median follow-up of 4.9 years (82 cases). Among patients who developed AVS, 39 (47.6%) were treated with atorvastatin 80 mg and 43 (52.4%) were treated with lower dose statin (atorvastatin 10 mg in Treating to New Targets, simvastatin 20 to 40 mg in Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering, or placebo in Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels; hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 1.41, p [ 0.67). In multivariate analyses forcing treatment, sex, and race into the model, factors that were significantly associated with AVS included age (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.93, p <0.0001 per 1-SD increment), diabetes (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.80, p [ 0.05), vitamin K antagonist use (HR 3.25, 95% CI 2.06 to 5.16, p <0.0001), and previous statin use (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.54 to 4.60, p [ 0.0008). In conclusion, random allocation to high-dose versus usual-dose statin therapy or placebo did not impact the incidence of AVS among patients without known AVS. Age, diabetes, vitamin K antagonists, and previous statin use were significant predictors of incident AVS in these high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00029149
Volume :
113
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
95301658
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.414