Back to Search Start Over

Pre-emptive Penile Ring Block With Sucrose Analgesia Reduces Pain Response to Neonatal Circumcision.

Authors :
Roman-Rodriguez, Christian F.
Toussaint, Thomas
Sherlock, Douglas J.
Fogel, Joshua
Hsu, Chaur-Dong
Source :
Urology. Apr2014, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p893-898. 6p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objective: To compare retrospective use of oral sucrose (SUC) vs oral sucrose plus lidocaine ring block (SUC + RB) in the management of pain during neonatal circumcision. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of newborns circumcised using the “Neonatal Infant Pain Scale” was done. Results: With regard to pain, the SUC group had a significantly greater percentage of those with pain than the SUC + RB group at 1 minute (77.7% vs 69.4%; P = .01) and 5 minutes (65.7% vs 55.7%; P = .004). There was no significant pain difference at 30 minutes. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, those in the SUC group had significantly greater odds for pain at 1 minute than those in the SUC + RB group (odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.02; P = .03). No significant difference was noted at 5 minutes. Each of the SUC and SUC + RB groups had significant decreases in pain percentages at 5 minutes and 30 minutes (P <.001). In addition, post-term gestational age had significantly greater odds for pain at 5 minutes (odds ratio 3.67, 95% confidence interval 1.51-8.93; P = .004). Conclusion: We found that sucrose use alone as compared with sucrose and ring block combined had greater odds for pain at 1 minute but not at 5 minutes. In addition, those with post-term gestational age had greater odds for pain at 5 minutes as compared with those with regular gestational age. We recommend for hospital-based circumcision using clamps, the use of combined sucrose and ring block for increased analgesia. In addition, for post-term neonates, we recommend greater focus on pain levels, including considering higher dosages of pain medications. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
83
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
95125514
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.010