Back to Search Start Over

Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors :
Hagen, Suzanne
Stark, Diane
Glazener, Cathryn
Dickson, Sylvia
Barry, Sarah
Elders, Andrew
Frawley, Helena
Galea, Mary P.
Logan, Janet
McDonald, Alison
McPherson, Gladys
Moore, Kate H.
Norrie, John
Walker, Andrew
Wilson, Don
Source :
Lancet. 3/1/2014, Vol. 383 Issue 9919, p796-806. 11p. 1 Diagram, 5 Charts.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background Pelvic organ prolapse is common and is strongly associated with childbirth and increasing age. Women with prolapse are often advised to do pelvic floor muscle exercises, but evidence supporting the benefits of such exercises is scarce. We aimed to establish the effectiveness of one-to-one individualised pelvic floor muscle training for reducing prolapse symptoms. Methods We did a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial at 23 centres in the UK, one in New Zealand, and one in Australia, between June 22, 2007, and April 9, 2010. Female outpatients with newly-diagnosed, symptomatic stage I, II, or III prolapse were randomly assigned (1:1), by remote computer allocation with minimsation, to receive an individualised programme of pelvic floor muscle training or a prolapse lifestyle advice leaflet and no muscle training (control group). Outcome assessors, and investigators who were gynaecologists at trial sites, were masked to group allocation; the statistician was masked until after data analysis. Our primary endpoint was participants' self-report of prolapse symptoms at 12 months. Analysis was by intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN35911035. Findings 447 eligible patients were randomised to the intervention group (n=225) or the control group (n=222). 377 (84%) participants completed follow-up for questionnaires at 6 months and 295 (66%) for questionnaires at 12 months. Women in the intervention group reported fewer prolapse symptoms (ie, a significantly greater reduction in the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score [POP-SS]) at 12 months than those in the control group (mean reduction in POP-SS from baseline 3 • 77 [SD 5 • 62] vs 2 • 09 [5 • 39]; adjusted difference 1 • 52, 95% CI 0 • 46-2 • 59; p=0 • 0053). Findings were robust to missing data. Eight adverse events (six vaginal symptoms, one case of back pain, and one case of abdominal pain) and one unexpected serious adverse event, all in women from the intervention group, were regarded as unrelated to the intervention or to participation in the study. Interpretation One-to-one pelvic floor muscle training for prolapse is effective for improvement of prolapse symptoms. Long-term benefits should be investigated, as should the effects in specific subgroups. Funding Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, New Zealand Lottery Board, and National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01406736
Volume :
383
Issue :
9919
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Lancet
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
94782312
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61977-7