Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicators.

Quality indicators (Qls) measure the extent to which set targets are attained and provide a guantitative basis for achieving improvement in care and, in particular, laboratory services. A body of evidence collected in recent years has demonstrated that most errors fall outside the analytical phase, while the pre- and post-analytical steps have been found to be more vulnerable to the risk of error. However, the current lack of attention to extra-laboratory factors and related Qls prevent clinical laboratories from effectively improving total quality and reducing errors. Errors in the pre-analytical phase, which account for 50% to 75% of all laboratory errors, have long been included in the 'identification and sample problems' category. However, according to the International Standard for medical laboratory accreditation and a patient-centered view, some additional Qls are needed. In particular, there is a need to measure the appropriateness of all test request and reguest forms, as well as the quality of sample transportation. The Qls model developed by a working group of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) is a valuable starting point for promoting the harmonization of available Qls, but further efforts should be made to achieve a consensus on the road map for harmonization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]