Back to Search Start Over

Prostate Cancer Antigen 3: Diagnostic Outcomes in Men Presenting With Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Scores ≥100.

Authors :
Schröder, Fritz H.
Venderbos, Lionne D.F.
van den Bergh, Roderick C.N.
Hessels, Daphne
van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.
van Leeuwen, Pim J.
Wolters, Tineke
Barentsz, Jelle O.
Roobol, Monique J.
Source :
Urology. Mar2014, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p613-616. 4p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objective: To describe the results of 3 rounds of diagnostic testing and linkage to the Dutch Cancer Registry for men with an initial prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) score ≥100. Methods: Within an earlier reported comparative study of PCA3 vs prostate-specific antigen in a prescreened population, 90 men with a PCA3 score ≥100 were identified and underwent biopsy, 28 prostate cancers (PCs) were found, 62 men remained at risk of a diagnosis of PC. All men were offered repeat testing; 6 PCs were found in 20 men at rebiopsy. Men with at least 1 negative biopsy (n = 56) were invited to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies and MRI-guided biopsies if indicated. Linkage to the Dutch Cancer Registry after 2.8 years of follow-up was performed for men with negative biopsies. Results: Of the 56 men at risk, 28 agreed to participate in further testing. They were offered MRI studies; only 7 men agreed, and in 2, suspicious lesions were found and biopsies carried out. Only 1 PC was diagnosed and classified as T1c, Gleason 3 + 3 = 6. The overall findings of 3 rounds of testing and of linkage to the cancer registry show that eventually 35 PCs were detected in 90 men with PCA3 scores ≥100 (positive predictive value 38.9%). Conclusion: Finding no PC despite extended diagnostic efforts in many men with initial PCA3 scores ≥100 is unexpected and might be clinically relevant. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
83
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
94687070
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.005