Back to Search Start Over

Fault network modeling of crustal deformation in California constrained using GPS and geologic observations.

Authors :
Zeng, Yuehua
Shen, Zheng-Kang
Source :
Tectonophysics. Feb2014, Vol. 612-613, p1-17. 17p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Abstract: We have developed a kinematic fault network model of crustal deformation in an elastic half-space. Surface deformation is calculated using this model assuming each fault segment slipping beneath a locking depth. Each fault segment connects to its adjacent elements with slip vector continuity imposed at fault nodes or intersections; the degree of the constraints determines whether deformation is block-like or not. We apply this model to invert GPS observations for slip rates on major faults in California with geological rate constraints. Based on the F-test result, we find that lesser block-like models fit the data significantly better than the strictly block-like model. Our final inversion shows a slip rate varying from 20 to 23mm/yr along the northern San Andreas from the Santa Cruz to the North Coast segment. Slip rates vary from 9 to 13mm/yr along the Hayward to the Maacama fault segment, and from 15 to 3mm/yr along the central Calaveras to the West Napa fault segment. For the central California Creeping Zone, the result suggests a depth dependent creep rate with an average of 22mm/yr over the top 5km and 32mm/yr underneath. From the Mojave to San Bernardino Mountain segments, we also find a significant decrease in slip rate along the San Andreas in comparison with the geologic rates, in contrast to a significant increase in slip rate on faults along the eastern California shear zone. Along the southern San Andreas, slip rates vary from 21 to 25mm/yr from the Coachella Valley to Imperial Valley segments. Slip rates range from 0 to 3mm/yr across the western Transverse Ranges faults, which is consistent with the regional crustal thickening. Overall slip rates derived from geodetic observations correlate strongly with the geologic slip rates statistically, suggesting high compatibility between geodetic and geologic observations. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00401951
Volume :
612-613
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Tectonophysics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
93700038
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.030