Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy of the 1990 Census and Undercount Adjustments.

Authors :
Mulry, Mary H.
Spencer, Bruce D.
Source :
Journal of the American Statistical Association. Sep93, Vol. 88 Issue 423, p1080-1091. 12p. 5 Charts.
Publication Year :
1993

Abstract

In July 1991 the Census Bureau recommended to its parent agency, the Department of Commerce, that the 1990 census be adjusted for undercount. The Secretary of Commerce decided not to adjust, however. Those decisions relied at least partly on the Census Bureau's analyses of the accuracy of the census and of the proposed undercount adjustments based on the Post-Enumeration Survey (PES). Error distributions for the nation, states, and smaller geographic units were estimated with extensions of methods applied to test censuses. To summarize and assess the relative importance of errors in different units, the Census Bureau used aggregate loss functions. This article describes the total error analysis and loss function analysis of the Census Bureau. In its decision not to adjust the census, the Department of Commerce cited different criteria than aggregate loss functions. Those criteria are identified and discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01621459
Volume :
88
Issue :
423
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
9312090753
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476379