Back to Search
Start Over
Does male behavioral type correlate with species recognition and stress?
- Source :
-
Behavioral Ecology . Jan2014, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p200-205. 6p. - Publication Year :
- 2014
-
Abstract
- Mating with the right species is important, but males of some species occasionally mate with females of a closely related species. This scenario can arise when males of one species coexist with females of another gynogenetic species. These females reproduce asexually, but need sperm from males to start development of their eggs – but the male’s genes are not inherited by offspring. In this study we explored hypotheses for why male sailfin mollies mate with asexual Amazon mollies.The persistence of gynogenetic organisms is an evolutionary paradox. An ideal system for examining the persistence of gynogens is the unisexual–bisexual mating complex of the unisexual Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa), and the bisexual, parent species, the sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna) and the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana). Insight into the maintenance of this mating complex might be enhanced by taking a more holistic view of male and female behavior through a behavioral syndrome framework. In this study, we examined whether male mate choice is part of a behavioral syndrome. We quantified behaviors related to activity, boldness, exploration, and sociability in male sailfin mollies, as well as their mate preference for conspecific females or the all-female species of Amazon mollies. In addition, we explored the relationship between behavioral type and cortisol (a fish stress hormone) production in male sailfin mollies. We found evidence for behavioral correlations in male sailfin mollies, but individual behavioral type was not correlated with their mate preference or stress hormone production. However, we did find differences in preexperience cortisol production related to male boldness behaviors. The lack of correlation between behavioral types, mate preference, and stress hormone production emphasizes that the nature of behavioral–hormonal interactions is complex. In summary, neither individual traits nor the behavioral types found here are adequate to explain the maintenance of this unisexual–bisexual mating system. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10452249
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 93065285
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art106