Comparison of the reliability and validity of four contemporary risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation

MLA

Abu-Assi, E., et al. “Comparison of the Reliability and Validity of Four Contemporary Risk Stratification Schemes to Predict Thromboembolism in Non-Anticoagulated Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 166, no. 1, June 2013, pp. 205–09. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.096.

APA

Abu-Assi, E., Otero-Raviña, F., Allut Vidal, G., Coutado Méndez, A., Vaamonde Mosquera, L., Sánchez Loureiro, M., Caneda Villar, M. C., Fernández Villaverde, J. M., Maestro Saavedra, F. J., & González-Juanatey, J. R. (2013). Comparison of the reliability and validity of four contemporary risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Cardiology, 166(1), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.096

Chicago

Abu-Assi, E., F. Otero-Raviña, G. Allut Vidal, A. Coutado Méndez, L. Vaamonde Mosquera, M. Sánchez Loureiro, M.C. Caneda Villar, J.M. Fernández Villaverde, F.J. Maestro Saavedra, and J.R. González-Juanatey. 2013. “Comparison of the Reliability and Validity of Four Contemporary Risk Stratification Schemes to Predict Thromboembolism in Non-Anticoagulated Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.” International Journal of Cardiology 166 (1): 205–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.096.