Back to Search Start Over

Tension band wiring of the olecranon: Is it really a dynamic principle of osteosynthesis?

Authors :
Brink, P.R.G.
Windolf, M.
de Boer, P.
Brianza, S.
Braunstein, V.
Schwieger, K.
Source :
Injury. Apr2013, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p518-522. 5p.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Abstract: The tension band principle as applied to transverse olecranon fractures fixed by tension band wiring is based on the premise that distraction forces on the outer cortex of the ulna during elbow flexion are converted to compression forces on the articular surface of the olecranon at the fracture site. In view of some clinical outcomes, where hardware failure and secondary dislocations occur, the question arises if the dynamic compression theory is correct. Compressive forces during active flexion and extension after tension band wiring of a transverse osteotomy of the olecranon were measured in 6 fresh frozen human cadaveric models using a pressure-sensor in the osteotomy gap. We could collect 30 measurements during active flexion and 30 during active extension. Active flexion did not cause any compressive forces in the osteotomy gap. Extension with the humerus in an upright position and the elbow actively extended causes some compression (0.37–0.51MPa) at the articular surface comparing with active flexion (0.2MPa) due to gravity forces. Posterior, there was no significant pressure difference observed (0.41–0.45 versus 0.36–0.32MPa) between active flexion and extension. The tension band wiring principle only exists during active extension in a range of 30–120° of flexion of the elbow. Postoperative exercise programs should be modified in order to prevent loss of compression at the fracture site of transverse olecranon fractures, treated with tension band wiring when the elbow is mobilised. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00201383
Volume :
44
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Injury
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
86156453
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.052