Back to Search Start Over

Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and visual analogue scale before and after septal surgery: a prospective 10-year follow-up.

Authors :
Haavisto, L.E.
Sipilä, J.I.
Source :
Clinical Otolaryngology. Feb2013, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p23-29. 7p. 2 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to compare rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry and subjective estimation of the nasal obstruction before and after septoplasty and to evaluate the long-term results of septal surgery. Design Prospective long-term follow-up, before and after septoplasty. Setting University tertiary-care hospital, referral centre. Participants The study included 30 adult patients who were operated on because of septal deviation. Main outcome measures Pre-operatively, acoustic rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry were performed on each subject after decongestion of the nose. A visual analogue scale for unilateral nasal obstruction was filled in by the patients. The measurements were repeated both 6 months and 10 years post-operatively. Results A significant change in acoustic values was found during the long-term follow-up of 10 years. The mean minimal cross-sectional area on the more obstructive side was 0.35 cm2 pre-operatively. Six months after operation, it was 0.52 cm2, and 10 years after operation, it was 0.68 cm2. The mean resistance fell from pre-operative 1.16 Pa/mL/s to 0.41 Pa/mL/s during the first 6 months, but rose again to 1.21 Pa/mL/s after 10 years. Despite a tendency of improvement, no statistically significant change was found between pre-operative and postoperative values in VAS. Six months after operation 69% of the patients were satisfied with the result, and after ten years the amount of satisfied patients was 83%. Conclusions We found an increase in acoustic values, but an increase in nasal resistance in the long-term follow-up. Other factors than nasal area may have an impact on nasal resistance and the feeling of nasal obstruction. The small size on the sample interfered with the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17494478
Volume :
38
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Otolaryngology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
85603798
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12043