Back to Search Start Over

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FIRST AMENDMENT - COMPELLED COMMERCIAL SPEECH - D.C. CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT FDA RULE MANDATING GRAPHIC WARNING IMAGES ON CIGARETTE PACKAGING AND ADVERTISEMENTS VIOLATES FIRST AMENDMENT. -- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Food & Drug Administration, 696 F. 3d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 2012)

Source :
Harvard Law Review. Jan2013, Vol. 126 Issue 3, p818-825. 8p.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

The article discusses the 2012 U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit case R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) which deals with American constitutional law, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and compelled commercial speech in relation to cigarette packaging. The strict scrutiny judicial standard of review is mentioned, along with an examination of the government's interest in discouraging cigarette smoking.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0017811X
Volume :
126
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Harvard Law Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
84740574