Cytotoxic Effect of ICD-85 (Venom-derived Peptides) on HeLa Can-cer Cell Line and Normal LK Cells using MTT Assay.

Background: Cancer is the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. There are considerable efforts to identify naturally occurring sub-stances for use as new drugs in cancer therapy. Some components of animal venoms have been identified that possess substantial anticancer properties. In our previous studies, the cytotoxic effects of ICD-85 (venom-derived peptides) have been reported on HL-60 and MDA-MB231 cell lines. This has prompted us to investigate the comparative cytotoxic effects of ICD-85 on the HeLa cell line and normal lamb kidney (LK) cells. Methods: Cells were exposed to various concentrations (8 x 10-4 to 5.6 X 10 μg/ml) of ICD-85 at various incubation times (24, 48 and 72 hours). Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay. A morphological study was also carried out using an inverted microscope. Caspase-8 activity was assayed by the Caspase-8 Colorimetric Assay Kit in HeLa cells that were exposed to ICD-85 for 48 hours. Results: Data analysis showed that ICD-85 has a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect on HeLa cells with an inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50) of 26.62 ± 2.13 μg/ml at 24 hours, 27.33 ± 2.35 μg/ml at 48 hours, and 28.13 ± 2.52 μg/ml at 72 hours. Results also indicated that the cytotoxic effect of ICD-85, at 48 and 72 hours incubation times did not show significant alteration compared to 24 hours of exposure. Interestingly, the minimum concentration of ICD-85 which showed a cytotoxic effect on LK cells was found to be 3500-fold less than the minimum concentration that showed a cytotoxic effect on the HeLa cancer cells. While morphological analysis revealed a significant differ-ence that included the characteristic rounding of dying cells by treatment with ICD-85 compared with untreated HeLa cells, this difference was not observed in normal cells. ICD-85 increased caspase-8 activity in HeLa cells after 48 hours of exposure. Discussion: ICD-85 has a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect on HeLa cancer cells in contrast with its negligible effect on normal LK cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]