Back to Search Start Over

Use of Bayesian MUNE to show differing rate of loss of motor units in subgroups of ALS

Authors :
Baumann, F.
Henderson, R.D.
Ridall, P.G.
Pettitt, A.N.
McCombe, Pamela A.
Source :
Clinical Neurophysiology. Dec2012, Vol. 123 Issue 12, p2446-2453. 8p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate differences among patients with different clinical features of ALS, we used our Bayesian method of motor unit number estimation (MUNE). Methods: We performed serial MUNE studies on 42 subjects who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for ALS during the course of their illness. Subjects were classified into three subgroups according to whether they had typical ALS (with upper and lower motor neurone signs) or had predominantly upper motor neurone weakness with only minor LMN signs, or predominantly lower motor neurone weakness with only minor UMN signs. In all subjects we calculated the half life of MUs, defined as the expected time for the number of MUs to halve, in one or more of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM), abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscles. Results: The mean half life of MUs was less in subjects who had typical ALS with both upper and lower motor neurone signs than in those with predominantly upper motor neurone weakness or predominantly lower motor neurone weakness. In 18 subjects we analysed the estimated size of the MUs and demonstrated the appearance of large MUs in subjects with upper or lower motor neurone predominant weakness. We found that the appearance of large MUs was correlated with the half life of MUs. Conclusions: Patients with different clinical features of ALS have different rates of loss and different sizes of MUs. Significance: These findings could indicate differences in disease pathogenesis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13882457
Volume :
123
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
83299051
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.022