Non-pedicled vs vascular pedicled nasal flap in repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Conclusions: In our study, pedicled nasal flap (NF) did not provide better results than free nasal graft (NG) for primary closure of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea. In the future, a multicenter randomized study would be needed to confirm this result. The choice of surgical technique will depend on the surgeon's experience, and the position and size of the defect. Objectives: To evaluate our results in repairing CSF leaks, comparing the two techniques we used: free NG and pedicled NF. Methods: A total of 33 patients diagnosed with CSF rhinorrhea were operated on between June 2000 and May 2010; 17 were women. The mean age was 44.7 years (± 13.0). Twenty-two (66.6%) NFs of the middle and lower turbinate and septum were performed, the rest being NGs of the middle and lower turbinate only. A descriptive statistical analysis and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were carried out and the log-rank statistic was used to compare both techniques. Results: In the present study, 78% of defects were closed in all cases; NF was used in 86% (19) and NG in 63.63% (7). The mean follow-up was 71.5 (95% confidence interval (CI), 56.9-86.1) months. There were no statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]