Back to Search Start Over

Planning and building the corporate suburb of Mount Royal, 1910-1925.

Authors :
McCann, L. D.
Source :
Planning Perspectives. Jul96, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p259-301. 43p.
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

New models of urban planning, including the lofty design principles of City Beautiful architects and the comprehensive schemes of Garden City and Garden Suburb reformers, were introduced to Canada during the first decades of the twentieth century. Despite their widespread advocacy by professionals and civic-minded enthusiasts alike, the impact of these new models on the contemporary Canadian city was actually quite limited. However, selected principles of these models were used rather pragmatically in several locations, including the northwestern suburbs of Montreal where the Canadian Northern Railway built the 'Model City' of Mount Royal, a corporate suburb that was planned, designed, and developed as a real estate venture to help offset the costs of building a railway tunnel into the centre of Montreal. This paper examines the process of city-building in Mount Royal during the town's formative years, from 1910 to 1925. It demonstrates how the idea for the town emerged as a speculative residential scheme at the height of the pre-First World War land boom; how the City Beautiful ideals of Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr and the Garden Suburb principles of Henry Vivian were introduced to Montreal during their visits there in 1910; and how, one year later, their ideas and other planning models converged and were incorporated to form the unique design for Mount Royal's urban plan by Frederick Todd, a protege of the junior Olmsted and Canada's most prominent landscape architect of the early twentieth century.' [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subjects

Subjects :
*URBAN planning
*CITIES & towns

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02665433
Volume :
11
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Planning Perspectives
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
7615397
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/026654396364871