Interventional bleeding, hematoma and scar-formation after vacuum-biopsy under stereotactic guidance: Mammotome®-system 11g/8g vs. ATEC®-system 12g/9g

MLA

Schaefer, F. K. W., et al. “Interventional Bleeding, Hematoma and Scar-Formation after Vacuum-Biopsy under Stereotactic Guidance: Mammotome®-System 11g/8g vs. ATEC®-System 12g/9g.” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 5, May 2012, pp. e739–45. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.033.

APA

Schaefer, F. K. W., Order, B. M., Eckmann-Scholz, C., Strauss, A., Hilpert, F., Kroj, K., Biernath-Wüpping, J., Heller, M., Jonat, W., & Schaefer, P. J. (2012). Interventional bleeding, hematoma and scar-formation after vacuum-biopsy under stereotactic guidance: Mammotome®-system 11g/8g vs. ATEC®-system 12g/9g. European Journal of Radiology, 81(5), e739–e745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.033

Chicago

Schaefer, F.K.W., B.M. Order, C. Eckmann-Scholz, A. Strauss, F. Hilpert, K. Kroj, J. Biernath-Wüpping, M. Heller, W. Jonat, and P.J. Schaefer. 2012. “Interventional Bleeding, Hematoma and Scar-Formation after Vacuum-Biopsy under Stereotactic Guidance: Mammotome®-System 11g/8g vs. ATEC®-System 12g/9g.” European Journal of Radiology 81 (5): e739–45. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.033.