Back to Search
Start Over
Measurement of the 96Ru g(41+) factor and its nuclear structure interpretation.
- Source :
-
Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics . Jan2012, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p1-5. 5p. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Background: The experimental study of g(I > 2) factors of nuclear states can provide information about the evolution of collectivity in certain regions of the nuclear chart, and assist in obtaining a microscopic description of the nuclear wave functions. The measurements and explanations of g{I > 2) factors are still a challenge for experiments and theory. Purpose: Measurement of the g(2+1) and g(41) factors, the latter for the first time, in the 9644Ru nucleus. Comparison of the experimental results with calculations using the shell model and collective models. Methods: The experiments made use of the transient field technique, using a Coulomb-excitation reaction in inverse kinematics. Large scale shell model calculations were performed; comparisons with previous theoretical predictions, using the tidal-wave model and the hydrodynamical model, were carried out. Results: The values of g(2+1) = +0.46(2) and g(4+-) = +0.58(8) were experimentally obtained. While the g(2+1) value agrees with the hydrodynamical model prediction of g = Z/A = +0.46. the g(4+1 ) is in agreement with the shell model predictions. The trend of the experimental g factors, as a function of nuclear spin, is not reproduced by the theoretical models discussed. Conclusions: Measurements of g(2+1 ) and g(4+1 ) in 96Ru were performed. Further theoretical efforts are necessary to explain the trend of the g factors as a function of nuclear spin for the 96Ru nucleus. Future measurements of g(4+1) should reduce the uncertainty of the result. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 05562813
- Volume :
- 85
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 74019378
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.017305