Back to Search
Start Over
Apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol for identifying individuals at increased cardiovascular risk.
- Source :
-
Journal of Internal Medicine . Dec2010, Vol. 268 Issue 6, p567-577. 11p. 5 Charts. - Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- . Holewijn S, den Heijer M, Swinkels DW, Stalenhoef AFH, de Graaf J. (Address: Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Department of Endocrinology; and Department of Laboratory Medicine; Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, all at the Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) Apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol for identifying individuals at increased cardiovascular risk. J Intern Med 2010; 268: 567-577. Background. To compare apolipoprotein B (apoB), nonhigh-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-c) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) for identifying individuals with a deteriorated cardiovascular (CV) risk profile, including a panel of subclinical atherosclerosis measurements and prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a Dutch population-based cohort. Methods. Clinical and biochemical measurements and a panel of noninvasive parameters of subclinical atherosclerosis were determined in 1517 individuals, aged 50-70 years. Results. Both men and women with increasing levels of apoB and non-HDL-c were more obese, had higher blood pressure and fasting glucose levels, and a more atherogenic lipid profile. Furthermore, compared to the reference group (composed of those with apoB, non-HDL-c and LDL-c levels in the bottom quartiles), participants with high apoB and high non-HDL-c levels had a lower ankle-brachial index at rest (−3.5% and −3.1%, respectively) and after exercise (−6.3% and −4.7%, respectively), a thicker near wall (+4.8% and +4.2%, respectively), far wall (both +6.2%), and mean intima-media thickness (+5.7% and +5.3%, respectively) and more plaques (+54.2% and +54.3%, respectively). In addition, they also showed increased stiffness parameters (e.g. pulse wave velocity both +3.6%). Less clear differences in CV risk profile and subclinical atherosclerosis parameters were observed when participants were stratified by LDL-c level. Furthermore, apoB but not LDL-c detected prevalent CVD, and non-HDL-c only detected prevalent CVD in men. The discriminatory power for prevalent CVD expressed as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.60 ( P < 0.001) for apoB, 0.57 ( P = 0.001) for non-HDL-c and 0.54 ( P = 0.108) for LDL-c. Conclusion. Our data support the use of first apoB and secondly non-HDL-c above LDL-c for identifying individuals from the general population with a compromised CV phenotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09546820
- Volume :
- 268
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Internal Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 72096168
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02277.x