Back to Search Start Over

Rapid sediment removal from the Columbia River plume near field

Authors :
Nowacki, Daniel J.
Horner-Devine, Alexander R.
Nash, Jonathan D.
Jay, David A.
Source :
Continental Shelf Research. Mar2012, Vol. 35, p16-28. 13p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Abstract: We compute rates of sediment removal from the Columbia River, USA plume near field using a control volume technique. By using data from repeated transect passes along the plume axis, we account for variations in plume width, depth, and velocity, and we construct a framework for determining the dominant terms in the complete sediment balance. The contribution due to turbulent sediment flux is estimated using collocated measurements of turbulent shear and suspended-sediment concentration. The maximum sediment clearance rate on the landward end of the transect, 4km from the river mouth, is approximately 0.1gm−2 s−1, which corresponds to an effective removal velocity of 10mms−1. This is significantly higher than the settling velocities expected for single-grain and aggregate particles observed in the estuary. The plume clearance rate decreases seaward, with values of 0.01gm−2 s−1 6.5km from the river mouth. We investigate several potential mechanisms to explain the along-axis variability in sediment removal, including gravitational settling of several particle-size distributions and removal by turbulent mixing. A simple model that accounts for the settling of the distribution of particles observed in the estuary with the addition of a very fine sand settling class best explains the observed magnitude and the seaward decrease in the sediment removal rate. Although it is unlikely that fine sands are retained in the plume from the estuary due to their high settling speeds, we hypothesize that they may be locally resuspended landward of the transect. The turbulent flux of sediment out of the plume is almost an order of magnitude smaller than the total removal rates observed on the landward end of the transect. However, the turbulent flux generally is greater than the removal rate predicted for unflocculated fine silt, indicating that it may be important for smaller particle size distributions or farther from shore. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02784343
Volume :
35
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Continental Shelf Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
71805663
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2011.11.013