Back to Search Start Over

An Objective Uncertainty Factor Adjustment for Methylmercury Pharmacokinetic Variability.

Authors :
Stern, Alan H.
Clewell, Harvey J.
Swartout, Jeff
Source :
Human & Ecological Risk Assessment. Jun2002, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p885. 10p.
Publication Year :
2002

Abstract

While default uncertainty factor (UF) adjustments have been proposed for pharmacokinetic variability in the derivation of Reference Doses (RfDs), few attempts have been made to derive chemical-specific UFs for such variability. In recent epidemiologic data on the neuro-developmental effects of MeHg, Hg concentration in either hair or blood is the point-of-departure for RfD derivation. The application of a pharmacokinetic model to derive an intake dose from the measured biomarker concentration allows examination of the inter-individual variability in the relationship between intake dose and biomarker concentration through specification of the variability in model parameters. Three independent studies of this variability, using different models and/or different parameter values, are compared. While differences in central tendency estimates give different predictions of the intake dose corresponding to a given biomarker concentration, normalization of the central tendency estimate resulted in strong agreement among the studies. Starting with Hg concentration in hair or blood, and dividing a central tendency estimate of the corresponding intake dose by a UF of 2 to 3, accounts for 95 to 99% of the variability in the relationship between intake dose and biomarker concentration. This variability, however, encompasses only a portion of the maternal ingestion-to-fetal brain pathway. It is therefore likely that this UF underestimates the overall pharmacokinetic variability in this pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10807039
Volume :
8
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Human & Ecological Risk Assessment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
7073477
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/20028091057268