Back to Search
Start Over
Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test.
- Source :
-
Memory . Nov2011, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p836-852. 17p. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Two experiments examined the influence of practice with, and the expectancy of, open-book tests (students viewed studied material while taking the test) versus closed-book tests (students completed the test without viewing the studied material) on delayed retention and transfer. Using GRE materials specifically designed for open-book testing, participants studied passages and then took initial open- or closed-book tests. Open-book testing led to better initial performance than closed-book testing, but on a delayed criterial (closed-book) test both types of testing produced similar retention after a two-day delay in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2 participants were informed in advance about the type of delayed criterial test to expect (open- or closed-book). Expecting an open-book test (relative to a closed-book test) decreased participants’ time spent studying and their delayed test performance on closed-book comprehension and transfer tests, demonstrating that test expectancy can influence long-term learning. Expectancy of open-book tests may impair long-term retention and transfer compared to closed-book tests, despite superior initial performance on open-book tests and students’ preference for open-book tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09658211
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Memory
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 67286103
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.613840