Cite
THE APPELLATE DIVISION HAS SPOKEN -- SEQUESTRATION PROCEEDINGS DO NOT QUALIFY AS PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A CREDIT AGREEMENT UNDER THE NATIONAL CREDIT ACT 34 OF 2005: NAIDOO v ABSA BANK 2010 4 SA 597 (SCA).
MLA
Maghembe, N. “THE APPELLATE DIVISION HAS SPOKEN -- SEQUESTRATION PROCEEDINGS DO NOT QUALIFY AS PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A CREDIT AGREEMENT UNDER THE NATIONAL CREDIT ACT 34 OF 2005: NAIDOO v ABSA BANK 2010 4 SA 597 (SCA).” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, May 2011, pp. 171–80. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v14i2.7.
APA
Maghembe, N. (2011). THE APPELLATE DIVISION HAS SPOKEN -- SEQUESTRATION PROCEEDINGS DO NOT QUALIFY AS PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A CREDIT AGREEMENT UNDER THE NATIONAL CREDIT ACT 34 OF 2005: NAIDOO v ABSA BANK 2010 4 SA 597 (SCA). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 14(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v14i2.7
Chicago
Maghembe, N. 2011. “THE APPELLATE DIVISION HAS SPOKEN -- SEQUESTRATION PROCEEDINGS DO NOT QUALIFY AS PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A CREDIT AGREEMENT UNDER THE NATIONAL CREDIT ACT 34 OF 2005: NAIDOO v ABSA BANK 2010 4 SA 597 (SCA).” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 14 (2): 171–80. doi:10.4314/pelj.v14i2.7.