Improving Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative.

Context: Quality of care of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has received intense attention. However, it is unknown if a structured initiative for improving care of patients with AMI can be effectively implemented at a wide variety of hospitals. Objective: To measure the effects of a quality improvement project on adherence to evidence-based therapies for patients with AMI. Design and Setting: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) quality improvement project, which consisted of baseline measurement, implementation of improvement strategies, and remeasurement, in 10 acute-care hospitals in southeast Michigan. Patients: A random sample of Medicare and non-Medicare patients at baseline (July 1998–June 1999; n = 735) and following intervention (September 1–December 15, 2000; n = 914) admitted at the 10 study centers for treatment of confirmed AMI. A random sample of Medicare patients at baseline (January–December 1998; n = 513) and at remeasurement (March–August 2001; n = 388) admitted to 11 hospitals that volunteered, but were not selected, served as a control group. Intervention: The GAP project consisted of a kickoff presentation; creation of customized, guideline-oriented tools designed to facilitate adherence to key quality indicators; identification and assignment of local physician and nurse opinion leaders; grand rounds site visits; and premeasurement and postmeasurement of quality indicators. Main Outcome Measures: Differences in adherence to quality indicators (use of aspirin, β-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors at discharge; time to reperfusion; smoking cessation and diet counseling; and cholesterol assessment and treatment) in ideal patients, compared between baseline and postintervention samples and among Medicare patients in GAP hospitals and the control group. Results: Increases in adherence to key treatments were seen in the administration of aspirin (81% vs 87%; P =... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]