Back to Search
Start Over
NATURAL GOODNESS, RIGHTNESS, AND THE INTERSUBJECTIVITY OF REASON: REPLY TO ARROYO, CUMMISKEY, MOLAND, AND BIRD-POLLAN.
- Source :
-
Metaphilosophy . Jul2011, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p381-394. 14p. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Abstract: In response to Arroyo, I explain my position on the concept of "natural goodness" and how my use of that concept compares to that of Geach and Foot. An Aristotelian or functional notion of goodness provides the material for Kantian endorsement in a theory of value that avoids a metaphysical commitment to intrinsic values. In response to Cummiskey, I review reasons for thinking Kantianism and consequentialism incompatible, especially those objections to aggregation that arise from the notion of the natural good previously described. In response to Moland, I explain why I think Hegelian worries about the supposed emptiness of the Kantian self do not apply to my account. And in response to both Moland and BirdāPollan, I argue that, contrary to the view of some Hegelians, the intersubjective normativity of reason is not something developed through actual social relations; rather, it is something essential to an individual's relations with himself or herself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *REASON
*CONSEQUENTIALISM (Ethics)
*HEGELIANISM
*NORMATIVITY (Ethics)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00261068
- Volume :
- 42
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Metaphilosophy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 62354679
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01697.x