Back to Search
Start Over
The First Amendment, Upside Down: The Supreme Court's campaign finance ruling is a loss for fair and open electoral politics.
- Source :
-
New York Times . 6/28/2011, Vol. 160 Issue 55450, p22. 0p. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- The Supreme Court decision striking down public matching funds in Arizona's campaign finance system is a serious setback for American democracy. The opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. in Monday's 5-to-4 decision shows again the conservative majority's contempt for campaign finance laws that aim to provide some balance to the unlimited amounts of money flooding the political system. In the Citizens United case, the court ruled that the government may not ban corporations, unions and other moneyed institutions from spending in political campaigns. The Arizona decision is a companion to that destructive landmark ruling. It takes away a vital, innovative way of ensuring that candidates who do not have unlimited bank accounts can get enough public dollars to compete effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *LEGAL judgments
*ACTIONS & defenses (Law)
*CONSTITUTIONAL courts
*FINANCE laws
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 03624331
- Volume :
- 160
- Issue :
- 55450
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- New York Times
- Publication Type :
- News
- Accession number :
- 61871153