Back to Search Start Over

Cost-Effectiveness of Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer in the United Kingdom

Authors :
Whyte, Sophie
Cooper, Katy L.
Stevenson, Matt D.
Madan, Jason
Akehurst, Ron
Source :
Value in Health. Jun2011, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p465-474. 10p.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: We report a cost-effectiveness evaluation of granulocyte colony–stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods: A mathematical model was constructed simulating the experience of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Three strategies were modeled: primary prophylaxis (G-CSFs administered in all cycles), secondary prophylaxis (G-CSFs administered in all cycles after an FN event), and no G-CSF prophylaxis. Three G-CSFs were considered: filgrastim, lenograstim, and pegfilgrastim. Costs were taken from UK databases and utility values from published sources. A systematic review provided data on G-CSF efficacy. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses examined the effects of uncertainty in model parameters. Results: In the UK, base-case analysis with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £20K per quality-adjusted life year gained and also using list prices, the most cost-effective strategy was primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for a patient with baseline FN risk greater than 38%, secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for baseline FN risk 11% to 37%, and no G-CSFs for baseline FN risk less than 11%. Using a WTP threshold of £30K and list prices, primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was cost-effective for baseline FN risks greater than 29%. In all analyses, pegfilgrastim dominated filgrastim and lenograstim. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that higher WTP threshold, younger age, earlier stage at diagnosis, or reduced G-CSF prices result in G-CSF prophylaxis being cost-effective at lower baseline FN risk levels. Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim was the most cost-effective G-CSF. The most cost-effective strategy (primary or secondary prophylaxis) was dependent on the FN risk level for an individual patient, patient age and stage at diagnosis, and G-CSF price. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10983015
Volume :
14
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Value in Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
61455447
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.037