Back to Search
Start Over
Inter-individual variability of oscillatory responses to subject's own name. A single-subject analysis
- Source :
-
International Journal of Psychophysiology . Jun2011, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p227-235. 9p. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Abstract: In previous studies event-related potentials and oscillations in response to subject''s own name have been analyzed extensively on group-level in healthy subjects and in patients with a disorder of consciousness. Subject''s own name as a deviant produces a P3. With equiprobable stimuli, non-phase-locked alpha oscillations are smaller in response to subject''s own name compared to other names or subject''s own name backwards. However, little is known about replicability on a single-subject level. Seventeen healthy subjects were assessed in an own-name paradigm with equiprobable stimuli of subject''s own name, another name, and subject''s own name backwards. Event-related potentials and non-phase locked oscillations were analyzed with single-subject, non-parametric statistics. No consistent results were found either for ERPs or for the non-phase locked changes of oscillatory activities. Only 4 subjects showed a robust effect as expected, that is, a lower activity in the alpha–beta range to subject''s own name compared to other conditions. Four subjects elicited a higher activity for subject''s own name. Thus, analyzing the EEG reactivity in the own-name paradigm with equiprobable stimuli on a single-subject level yields a high variance between subjects. In future research, single-subject statistics should be applied for examining the validity of physiologic measurements in other paradigms and for examining the pattern of reactivity in patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 01678760
- Volume :
- 80
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 60518551
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.012