Conflict of Interpretations: the Bulgarian Context.

The aim of the paper is to put a stress on the significance of the context when facts from the history of philosophy are interpreted. The study of this particular case is based on research of archives, testifying simultaneously that the D. Michalchev - Rehmke's follower - positively appraises some of the ideas of Todor Pavlov while the Marxist, Nikolay Iribadzhakov, sharply criticizes him. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]