Back to Search Start Over

Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults -- The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Banerjee, Sughran
Barber, Julie
Chambler, Andrew
Cobiella, Carlos
Corbett, Steven
Crowther, Mark
Drew, Steven
Francis, Andrea
Lee, Marcus
Garlick, Nicholas
Packham, Iain
Pearse, Yemi
Richards, Andrew
Roberts, Chris
Tennent, Duncan
Tims, Emily
Ahrens, Philip Michael
Source :
Trials. 2011, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p57-62. 6p.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome can be unsatisfactory. In particular it is not clear whether surgery produces better outcomes than non-surgical management. Currently there is much variation in the use of surgery and a lack of good quality evidence to inform our decision. Methods/Design: We aim to undertake a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Surgical treatment will be performed using the Acumed clavicle fixation system. Conservative management will consist of immobilisation in a sling at the side in internal rotation for 6 weeks or until clinical or radiological union. We aim to recruit 300 patients. These patients will be followed-up for at least 9 months. The primary endpoint will be the rate of non-union at 3 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints will be limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 9 months post-operatively. Discussion: This article presents the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. It gives extensive details of, and the basis for, the chosen methods, and describes the key measures taken to avoid bias and to ensure validity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
59758365
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57