Compromises in Data Selection in a Meta-Analysis of Biodiversity in Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Response to Halme et al.

In this article the authors comment on the article "Flawed Meta-Analysis of Biodiversity Effects of Forest Management," by P. Halme and colleagues. The authors stress that Halme and colleagues has overlooked the fact that they have discussed the cofounding effects and limitations of meta-analysis (MA). They add that Halme and colleagues have questioned the independence of observation, but generally accepted the comparison of a single control to several experimental groups in the MA process.