Back to Search Start Over

Three-Year Outcome of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the MISSION! Intervention Study)

Authors :
Atary, Jael Z.
van der Hoeven, Bas L.
Liem, Su San
Jukema, J. Wouter
van der Bom, Johanna G.
Atsma, Douwe E.
Bootsma, Marianne
Zeppenfeld, Katja
van der Wall, Ernst E.
Schalij, Martin J.
Source :
American Journal of Cardiology. Jul2010, Vol. 106 Issue 1, p4-12. 9p.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) to those of bare-metal stents (BMS) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, outcomes were assessed in 310 patients (mean age age 59 ± 11 years, 78% men) included in the randomized MISSION! Intervention Study: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction after a median follow-up period of 38 months. All patients were treated with aspirin (lifelong) and clopidogrel for 1 year after stent implantation. Except for a significant difference between reference vessel diameters (SES 2.76 mm vs BMS 2.92 mm, p = 0.02), there were no significant differences in baseline and angiographic characteristics between the treatment groups (158 SES, 152 BMS). A significant difference between SES and BMS patients for all revascularization end points was found after the first year of follow-up. However, at 3 years of follow-up, although there was still a trend toward better clinical outcomes in SES-treated patients, differences were no longer significant (death 4.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.41; target vessel–related myocardial infarction 2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.32; target vessel revascularization 8.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.06), target lesion revascularization 6.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.06; and target vessel failure 12.0% vs 19.7%, p = 0.06). Three cases of very late (definite) stent thrombosis were observed in the SES group (1.9%) versus none in the BMS group (p = 0.14). In conclusion, the significant SES benefit (compared to BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions at 1-year follow-up in terms of target vessel revascularizations decreased to some extent because of more similar target vessel revascularization rates during the 2 subsequent years. Rates of death and nonfatal recurrent MI remained comparable. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00029149
Volume :
106
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
51817411
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.02.005