Improving sensitivity and resolution of MQMAS spectra: A 45Sc-NMR case study of scandium sulphate pentahydrate

Abstract: To efficiently obtain multiple-quantum magic-angle spinning (MQMAS) spectra of the nuclide 45Sc (I =7/2), we have combined several previously suggested techniques to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio and to improve spectral resolution for the test sample, scandium sulphate pentahydrate (ScSPH). Whereas the 45Sc-3QMAS spectrum of ScSPH does not offer sufficient resolution to clearly distinguish between the 3 scandium sites present in the crystal structure, these sites are well-resolved in the 5QMAS spectrum. The loss of sensitivity incurred by using MQMAS with 5Q coherence order is partly compensated for by using fast-amplitude modulated (FAM) sequences to improve the efficiency of both 5Q coherence excitation and conversion. Also, heteronuclear decoupling is employed to minimise dephasing of the 45Sc signal during the 5Q evolution period due to dipolar couplings with the water protons in the ScSPH sample. Application of multi-pulse decoupling schemes such as TPPM and SPINAL results in improved sensitivity and resolution in the F 1 (isotropic) dimension of the 5QMAS spectrum, the best results being achieved with the recently suggested SW f -TPPM sequence. By numerical fitting of the 45Sc-NMR spectra of ScSPH from 3QMAS, 5QMAS and single-quantum MAS at magnetic fields B 0 =9.4T and 17.6T, the isotropic chemical shift δ iso , the quadrupolar coupling constant χ, and the asymmetry parameter η were obtained. Averaging over all experiments, the NMR parameters determined for the 3 scandium sites, designated (a), (b) and (c) are: δ iso (a)=−15.5±0.5ppm, χ(a)=5.60±0.10MHz, η(a)=0.06±0.05; δ iso (b)=−12.9±0.5ppm, χ(b)=4.50±0.10MHz, η(b)=1.00±0.00; and δ iso (c)=−4.7±0.2ppm, χ(c)=4.55±0.05MHz, η(c)=0.50±0.02. The NMR scandium species were assigned to the independent crystallographic sites by evaluating their experimental response to proton decoupling, and by density functional theory (DFT) calculations using the PAW and GIPAW approaches, in the following way: Sc(1) to (c), Sc(2) to (a), and Sc(3) to (b). The need to compute NMR parameters using an energy-optimised crystal structure is once again demonstrated. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]