Back to Search Start Over

Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders

Authors :
Young, Brian A.
Walker, Michael J.
Strunce, Joseph B.
Boyles, Robert E.
Whitman, Julie M.
Childs, John D.
Source :
Spine Journal. Oct2009, Vol. 9 Issue 10, p802-808. 7p.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Report the test-retest reliability, construct validity, minimum clinically important difference (MCID), and minimal detectable change (MDC) for the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Study design/setting: Cohort study of patients presenting to outpatient physical therapy clinics. Patient sample: Ninety-one subjects with a primary complaint of neck pain, with or without concomitant upper extremity (UE) symptoms, who were participants in a randomized clinical trial. Outcome Measures: NDI and the 15-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) self-report measures. Methods: All subjects completed the NDI at baseline and at a 3-week follow-up. Additionally, subjects completed the GRC scale, which was used to dichotomize patients into improved or stable groups. Changes in the NDI were used to assess test-retest reliability, construct validity, MCID, and MDC. Results: Test-retest reliability was moderate for the NDI (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.84). For the NDI, the MCID was 7.5 points and the MDC was 10.2 points. Conclusions: The NDI appears to demonstrate adequate responsiveness based on statistical reference criteria when used in a sample that approximates the high percentage of patients with neck pain and concomitant UE referred symptoms. Because the MCID is within the bounds of measurement error, a 10-point change (the MDC) should be used as the MCID. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15299430
Volume :
9
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Spine Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
44259086
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002