Back to Search
Start Over
A Case for Critical Revision: Debunking the Myth of the Enlightened Teacher Versus the Resistant Student Writer.
- Source :
-
College Teaching . Spring2009, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p67-72. 6p. - Publication Year :
- 2009
-
Abstract
- Traditional scholarship on revision often creates a narrative of the "resistant student" versus the "enlightened teacher" who inherently accepts revision as natural and productive. Yet this narrative is a myth, one which often hampers effective instruction. In place of "traditional revision," I argue for teaching "critical revision," a dialogic process that allows students to take ownership over their choices as writers, helps to discourage plagiarism, and allows teachers to pinpoint areas in their own teaching-response style that they may need to approach in new or different ways to better facilitate student learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 87567555
- Volume :
- 57
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- College Teaching
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 36858242
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.57.2.67-72