Back to Search Start Over

Estimated Risk of Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer From Mammographic Screening for Young BRCA Mutation Carriers.

Authors :
De Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
Berg, Christine D.
Visvanathan, Kala
Robson, Mark
Source :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2/4/2009, Vol. 101 Issue 3, p205-209. 5p. 2 Color Photographs.
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

BRCA mutation carriers are recommended to start mammographic screening for breast cancer as early as age 25-30 years. We used an excess relative risk model (based on a pooled analysis of three cohorts with 7600 subjects who received radiation exposure) to estimate the lifetime risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from five annual mammographic screenings in young (<40 years) BRCA mutation carriers. We then estimated the reduction in breast cancer mortality required to out- weigh the radiation risk. Breast cancer rates for mutation carriers were based on a pooled analysis of 22 pedigree studies with 8139 subjects. For BRCAI mutation carriers, the estimated lifetime risk of radiation-induced breast cancer mortality per 10000 women resulting from annual mammography was 26 (95% confidence interval [li = 14 to 49) for screening at age 25-29 years, 20 (95% Cl = 11 to 39) for screening at age 30-34 years. and 13 (95% Cl = 7 to 23) for screening at age 35-39 years. To outweigh these risks, screening would have to reduce breast cancer mortality by 51% (95% Cl = 27% to 96%) at age 25-29 years, by 12% (95% Cl = 6% to 23%) at age 30-34 years, and by 4% (95% Cl = 2% to 7%) at age 35-39 years; estimates were similar for BRCA2 mutation carriers. If we assume that the mortality reduction from mammography is 15%-25% or less for young women, these results suggest that there would be no net benefit from annual mammographic screening of BRCA mutation carriers at age 25-29 years; the net benefit would be zero or small at age 30-34 years, but there should be some net benefit at age 35 or older. These results depend on a number of assumptions due to the absence of empiric data. The impact of varying these assumptions was therefore examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00278874
Volume :
101
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36654703
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn440