Back to Search
Start Over
Contentious politics in environmental assessment: blocked projects and winning coalitions.
- Source :
-
Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal . Mar2008, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p17-27. 11p. - Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- Environmental assessment (EA) is now institutionalized in over 100 countries but is widely criticized by practitioners and analysts for failing to convince decision-makers. Environmental sustainability is still not placed high on the list of criteria influencing project and programme approvals. This paper suggests that the failure of EA reflects the politically contested domain of EA. A framework for the analysis of public participation in EA based on the study of contentious politics is introduced. Public participation is a crucially important condition for influencing decision makers to pursue sustainability objectives, but the effectiveness of public participation is conditional upon characteristics of the coalitions created by diverse stakeholders. The importance of coalitions between local stakeholders and intellectuals is highlighted and exemplified through four cases in the Philippines, Brazil, South Africa and Taiwan where public participation in EA processes is associated with the blockage of large-scale development projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14615517
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31626427
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3152/146155108X279939