Back to Search Start Over

S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial

Authors :
Koizumi, Wasaburo
Narahara, Hiroyuki
Hara, Takuo
Takagane, Akinori
Akiya, Toshikazu
Takagi, Masakazu
Miyashita, Kosei
Nishizaki, Takashi
Kobayashi, Osamu
Takiyama, Wataru
Toh, Yasushi
Nagaie, Takashi
Takagi, Seiichi
Yamamura, Yoshitaka
Yanaoka, Kimihiko
Orita, Hiroyuki
Takeuchi, Masahiro
Source :
Lancet Oncology. Mar2008, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p215-221. 7p.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Summary: Background: Phase I/II clinical trials of S-1 plus cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer have yielded good responses and the treatment was well tolerated. In this S-1 Plus cisplatin versus S-1 In RCT In the Treatment for Stomach cancer (SPIRITS) trial, we aimed to verify that overall survival was better in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin than with S-1 alone. Methods: In this phase III trial, chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled betweeen March 26, 2002, and Nov 30, 2004, at 38 centres in Japan, and randomly assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin or S-1 alone. In patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin, S-1 (40–60 mg depending on patient''s body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin was given intravenously on day 8, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 5-week cycle. Those assigned to S-1 alone received the same dose of S-1 twice daily for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 6-week cycle. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, proportions of responders, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00150670. Findings: 305 patients were enrolled; seven patients were ineligible or withdrew consent, therefore, 148 patients were assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin and 150 patients were assigned to S-1 alone. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin (13·0 months [IQR 7·6–21·9]) than in those assigned to S-1 alone (11·0 months [5·6–19·8]; hazard ratio for death, 0·77; 95% CI 0·61–0·98; p=0·04). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin than in those assigned to S-1 alone (median progression-free survival 6·0 months [3·3–12·9] vs 4·0 months [2·1–6·8]; p<0·0001). Additionally, of 87 patients assigned S-1 plus cisplatin who had target tumours, one patient had a complete response and 46 patients had partial responses, ie, a total of 54% (range 43–65). Of 106 patients assigned S-1 alone who had target tumours, one patient had a complete response and 32 had partial responses, ie, a total of 31% (23–41). We recorded more grade 3 or 4 adverse events including leucopenia, neutropenia, anaemia, nausea, and anorexia, in the group assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin than in the group assigned to S-1 alone. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. Interpretation: S-1 plus cisplatin holds promise of becoming a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14702045
Volume :
9
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Lancet Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30770291
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70035-4